Our results reveal the overwhelming direct effect of protecting fished species in marine reserves over indirect effects that are often predicted but seldom clearly documented. Steve Gould was right when he criticized the simple transfer of biological concepts to the fossil record, which characterized much early work in paleobiology. STA 265-01, Methods of Statistics and Data Science, MW 2:30-3:45, FH 108.
Therefore, urchin biomass overall has increased inside reserves, and we found no evidence that giant kelp is positively affected by reserves. Course notes are provided in links below, prepared using Bookdown. Instead, our analyses revealed that purple urchin populations were unaffected by reserves, and red urchin biomass significantly increased in response to protection. experience with materials and research methods used by biological anthropologists. We hypothesized that urchin populations inside marine reserves would be depressed by higher predation, but that red urchins would be less affected due to fishing outside reserves. In California's northern Channel Islands, two species of sea urchins are abundant: the red urchin Mesocentrotus franciscanus, which is targeted by an economically valuable fishery, and the virtually unfished purple urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Marine reserves can induce trophic cascades by increasing predator density and body size, thereby increasing predation pressure on populations of herbivores, such as sea urchins. In marine ecosystems, fishing often targets predators, which can drive direct and indirect effects on entire food webs.
0 kommentar(er)
